Rev. Rul. 2001-29: Rental activity producing rent under § 856(d) can be an ATB

In Rev. Rul. 99-6, the IRS provides that certain transfers of partnership interests cause termination of a partnership.

Rev. Rul. 2001-29: Rental activity producing rent under § 856(d) can be an ATB

In Rev. Rul. 99-6, the IRS provides that certain transfers of partnership interests cause termination of a partnership.

Citations: Rev. Rul. 2001-29; 2001-1 C.B. 1348

Rev. Rul. 2001-29

ISSUE

[1] Can a real estate investment trust (REIT) be engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business within the meaning of section 355(b) of the Internal Revenue Code solely by virtue of functions with respect to rental activity that produces income qualifying as rents from real property within the meaning of section 856(d)?

LAW AND ANALYSIS

[2] Sections 355(a)(1)(C) and (b) require that both the distributing and controlled corporations be engaged, immediately after a distribution, in the active conduct of a trade or business that has been actively conducted throughout the five year period ending on the date of the distribution. Section 1.355-3(b)(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the determination of whether a trade or business is actively conducted is made from all the facts and circumstances. Generally, a corporation is treated as actively conducting a trade or business only if it performs active and substantial management and operational functions. Generally, activities performed by the corporation do not include activities performed by persons outside the corporation, including independent contractors. However, a corporation may satisfy the active trade or business test through the activities it performs itself, even though some of its activities are performed by others. For an illustration of active and substantial management and operational functions in the context of the rental of real property, see generally Rev. Rul. 79-394, 1979-2 C.B. 141, as amplified by Rev. Rul. 80-181, 1980-2 C.B. 121.

[3] In Rev. Rul. 73-236, 1973-1 C.B. 183, X, an unincorporated domestic trust qualifying as an association taxable as a corporation under section 7701(a)(3), was engaged for more than five years in the sale of real estate that it developed and improved, and in the leasing of buildings that it constructed. In order to raise capital, X intended to convert to a REIT, as defined in section 856. In order to satisfy certain requirements of section 856, X had to dispose of property that it held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. To accomplish this, X transferred this property to Y, a newly formed corporation, in exchange for all of the Y stock, which X distributed to its beneficiaries pro rata. Immediately following the Y stock distribution and as part of an overall plan, X elected REIT status. In order to ensure that it would meet the requirements of section 856(c), X managed and operated its real estate leasing operations through independent contractors so as to qualify all of its rental income as "rents from real property" within the meaning of section 856(d). Section 856(d)(3), as in effect when Rev. Rul. 73-236 was issued, excluded from the term "rents from real property" amounts received with respect to such property "if the real estate investment trust furnishes or renders services to the tenants of such property, or manages or operates such property, other than through an independent contractor from whom the trust itself does not derive or receive any income." (In 1976, this provision was redesignated section 856(d)(2)(C). See Tax Reform Act of 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-455, section 1604(b), 90 Stat. 1520, 1749 (1976).)

[4] The only issue that Rev. Rul. 73-236 considered was whether X, after the distribution and while qualifying as a REIT under section 856, was engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business within the meaning of section 355(b). Because X's rental activities conducted as a REIT were designed to qualify all of its rental income as "rents from real property" within the meaning of section 856(d), Rev. Rul. 73-236 concluded that X did not directly perform substantial management and operational activities and, therefore, that X was not engaged in an active trade or business within the meaning of section 355(b) immediately after the distribution of the Y stock.

[5] Section 663 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99- 514, 100 Stat. 2085, 2302 (1986), amended section 856(d)(2)(C). Under the statute, as amended, amounts that would qualify as rents from real property under section 512(b)(3) if received by an organization described in section 511(a)(2) are not excluded from rents from real property under section 856(d)(2)(C). Section 512(b)(3) excludes rents from real property from unrelated business taxable income. Section 1.512(b)-1(c)(5) interprets section 512(b)(3) to permit an organization to treat rental income as rents from real property even if, in connection with the rental activity, it furnishes certain services that are not primarily for the convenience of the occupant and are usually or customarily rendered in connection with the rental of real property. Such services include, for example, the furnishing of heat and light; the cleaning of public entrances, exits, stairways, and lobbies; and the collection of trash. Consequently, as a result of the 1986 amendment, a REIT is permitted to perform activities that can constitute active and substantial management and operational functions with respect to rental activity that produces income qualifying as rents from real property under section 856(d).

HOLDING

[6] A REIT can be engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business within the meaning of section 355(b) solely by virtue of functions with respect to rental activity that produces income qualifying as rents from real property within the meaning of section 856(d).

EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE RULING

[7] Rev. Rul. 73-236 is obsoleted.

[8] The obsolescence of Rev. Rul. 73-236, which denied section 355 treatment to a distribution of stock by a C corporation that converted to a REIT because the REIT was not engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business, does not imply a view as to whether a distribution of stock involving a REIT election by the distributing or controlled corporation would otherwise satisfy the requirements of section 355, including the corporate business purpose requirement of section 1.355-2(b).

DRAFTING INFORMATION

[9] The principal author of this revenue ruling is Richard Passales of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Mr. Passales on (202) 622-7530 (not a toll-free call).

‍

Product heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Get Started

Related Diagrams

10 Min Read

Rev. Rul. 82-150: Deep-in-the-money options

In Rev. Rul. 82-150, the IRS holds that a sale of a deep-in-the-money option was, in substance, not an option but a completed sale of the referenced stock for purposes of the foreign personal holding company rules.

Explore Diagrams
10 Min Read

Rev. Rul. 70-224: Cause to be directed; § 368(a)(2)(C)

Rev. Rul. 70-224: It is held that the transaction in the instant case is an acquisition by X, solely in exchange for its voting stock and the assumption of Z's liabilities, of substantially all of the properties of Z, and is, therefore, a reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a)(1)(C) and section 368(a)(2)(C) of the Code. The fact that all the assets of Z were transferred directly to Y rather than through X to Y does not affect the reorganization.

Explore Diagrams
10 Min Read

Rev. Rul. 2001-46, Sit. 2: Acquisition merger & upstream merger collapsed

Rev. Rul. 2001-46, Sit. 2: Under the facts presented, if, pursuant to an integrated plan, a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of an acquiring corporation merges into a target corporation, followed by the merger of the target corporation into the acquiring corporation, the transaction is treated as a single statutory merger of the target corporation into the acquiring corporation that qualifies as a reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(A).

Explore Diagrams