Rev. Rul. 2003-55: Good § 355 spin even though IPO not completed

In Rev. Rul. 99-6, the IRS provides that certain transfers of partnership interests cause termination of a partnership.

Rev. Rul. 2003-55: Good § 355 spin even though IPO not completed

In Rev. Rul. 99-6, the IRS provides that certain transfers of partnership interests cause termination of a partnership.

Rev. Rul. 2003-55:Citations: Rev. Rul. 2003-55; 2003-1 C.B. 961

Rev. Rul. 2003-55

ISSUE

[1] Is the business purpose requirement of § 1.355-2(b) of the Income Tax Regulations satisfied if the distribution of the stock of a controlled corporation is, at the time of the distribution, motivated, in whole or substantial part, by a corporate business purpose, but that purpose cannot be achieved as the result of an unexpected change in circumstances following the distribution?

FACTS

[2] D is a publicly traded corporation that conducts Business A and Business B directly and Business C through its wholly owned subsidiary C. Business C needs to raise a substantial amount of capital in the near future to invest in plant and equipment and to make acquisitions. D has been advised by its investment banker that the best way to raise this capital is through an initial public offering of C stock after C has been separated from D. The investment banker believes, based on its analysis of comparable situations, and taking into account the current market climate, that such an offering would be more efficient than a stock offering by C or D without first separating from the other because it would raise the needed capital with significantly less dilution of the existing shareholders' interests in the combined enterprises.

[3] In reliance on the investment banker's opinion, D distributes the stock of C to its shareholders, and C prepares to offer its stock to the public as soon as practicable but with a target date approximately six months after the distribution. Following the distribution and before the offering can be undertaken, market conditions unexpectedly deteriorate to such an extent that, in the judgment of C and its advisors, the offering should be postponed. One year after the distribution, conditions have not improved sufficiently to permit the offering to go forward and C funds its capital needs through the sale of debentures.

[4] Apart from the issue of whether the business purpose requirement of § 1.355-2(b) is satisfied, the distribution meets all of the requirements of § 355 of the Internal Revenue Code.

LAW

[5] Section 355 provides that if certain requirements are met, a corporation may distribute stock and securities in a controlled corporation to its shareholders and security holders without causing the distributing corporation or the distributees to recognize gain or loss.

[6] To qualify as a distribution described in § 355, a distribution must, in addition to satisfying the statutory requirements of § 355, satisfy certain requirements in the regulations, including the business purpose requirement. Section 1.355-2(b)(1) provides that a distribution must be motivated, in whole or substantial part, by one or more corporate business purposes. A corporate business purpose is a real and substantial non- Federal tax purpose germane to the business of the distributing corporation, the controlled corporation, or the affiliated group to which the distributing corporation belongs. Section 1.355-2(b)(2). The principal reason for the business purpose requirement is to provide nonrecognition treatment only to distributions that are incident to readjustments of corporate structures required by business exigencies and that effect only readjustments of continuing interests in property under modified corporate forms. Section 1.355- 2(b)(1).

ANALYSIS

[7] To satisfy the business purpose requirement of § 1.355-2(b)(1), a distribution of controlled corporation stock must be motivated, in whole or substantial part, by a corporate business purpose. A corporate business purpose is a real and substantial non- Federal tax purpose germane to the business of the distributing corporation, the controlled corporation, or the affiliated group to which the distributing corporation belongs. The regulations do not require that the corporation in fact succeed in meeting its corporate business purpose, as long as, at the time of the distribution, such a purpose exists and motivates, in whole or substantial part, the distribution. An unexpected change in market or business conditions following a distribution that prevents achievement of the business purpose will not prevent satisfaction of the business purpose requirement. Hence, notwithstanding the fact that, as a result of the unexpected deterioration in market conditions, C does not complete the stock offering that motivated its separation from D, the business purpose requirement of § 1.355-2(b)(1) is satisfied.

HOLDING

[8] The business purpose requirement of § 1.355-2(b) is satisfied if the distribution of the stock of a controlled corporation is, at the time of the distribution, motivated, in whole or substantial part, by a corporate business purpose, but that purpose cannot be achieved as the result of an unexpected change in circumstances following the distribution.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

[9] The principal author of this revenue ruling is Wayne T. Murray of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Mr. Murray on (202) 622-7700 (not a toll-free call).

‍

Product heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Get Started

Related Diagrams

10 Min Read

Rev. Rul. 70-224: Cause to be directed; § 368(a)(2)(C)

Rev. Rul. 70-224: It is held that the transaction in the instant case is an acquisition by X, solely in exchange for its voting stock and the assumption of Z's liabilities, of substantially all of the properties of Z, and is, therefore, a reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a)(1)(C) and section 368(a)(2)(C) of the Code. The fact that all the assets of Z were transferred directly to Y rather than through X to Y does not affect the reorganization.

Explore Diagrams
10 Min Read

Rev. Rul. 82-150: Deep-in-the-money options

In Rev. Rul. 82-150, the IRS holds that a sale of a deep-in-the-money option was, in substance, not an option but a completed sale of the referenced stock for purposes of the foreign personal holding company rules.

Explore Diagrams
10 Min Read

Rev. Rul. 2001-46, Sit. 2: Acquisition merger & upstream merger collapsed

Rev. Rul. 2001-46, Sit. 2: Under the facts presented, if, pursuant to an integrated plan, a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of an acquiring corporation merges into a target corporation, followed by the merger of the target corporation into the acquiring corporation, the transaction is treated as a single statutory merger of the target corporation into the acquiring corporation that qualifies as a reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(A).

Explore Diagrams